1Gonzolo Lira awakened me to this one. Before his post I was blissfully unaware of the NDAA1 .

Those who read me already know how I feel about the various renditions of the Patriot Acts. The NDAA passes those so far that you can’t even see them in the rear-view mirror. Embedded into this POS2 is a little something called Indefinite Detention AKA the Levin/McCain detention bill. It is a part and parcel of the NDAA. Last December, Glenn Greenwald, writing for Salon, did a detailed analysis of this bill and the three critical points incorporated within it.

  1. The Bill codifies Indefinite Detentions: Basically, it suspends Article 1, section 9, of the US Constitution in its entirety and indefinitely. It even removes the requirement for a trial. Anyone may be detained simply on suspicion and no proof is required whatsoever. Of course, without the requirement of a trial, due process becomes a dim historical artifact. It might be noted that Roman tyrants gained permanent ascendency over the triumvirate, ending the Roman Republic, by the simple expedient of declaring a permanent state of war (This may mark the historical end of the Republic of the United States) .
  2. It expands the scope of the War on Terror to the point that it can never be won. It becomes a war that does not end and therefore supports the first point (above).
  3. US citizens are not exempt from this bill3 . It leaves open the possibility of subjecting American citizens to military detention and trial by a military court to include indefinite detention of anyone suspected of being a member of Al Qaeda or an amorphous group of “associated forces” that could cover just about anyone arrested anywhere in the world.
  4. A fourth point that many analysts miss is that these are military detentions of non-military subjects and thus violates the Posse Comitatus Act. Although the Posse Comitatus is not a part of the US Constitution, it is motivated by said document and expands on it.

Not to put too fine a point on it, the NDAA shits all over the US Constitution and the US Bill of Rights.



  1. National Defense Authorization Act of 2012  More links can be found on Google. []
  2. POS=Piece Of Shit []
  3. Surprisingly, this was done at Obama’s insistence. []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

They’ve done it. You can no longer board even a train or bus without papers.

The Transportation Security Administration isn’t just in airports anymore. TSA teams are increasingly conducting searches and screenings at train stations, subways, ferry terminals and other mass transit locations around the country.

Whatever happened to the 4th and 5th Amendments?


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

Prosecutors and police are largely held immune from their faulty actions, not even compensating for the direct harm of their actions. My previous article on Mr. Morton, a man falsely imprisoned for 25 years, is but the tip of this iceberg. At the core of this is prosecutorial immunity and it needs to end.

The article is here and the discussions are there.

Once released, those arrested have little recourse. State and federal laws generally protect law enforcement agencies from lawsuits over such detentions as long as officers were acting on a valid warrant and had a reasonable belief that they were arresting the right person.

The problem is that these people, innocent victims, are not compensated or even returned to their homes. In the case of a Nissan customer service supervisor who was hauled by authorities from Tennessee to L.A. County on a local sex-crimes warrant meant for someone with a similar name. How did he get back home to Tennessee?

The worst of these was the case of Santiago Ibarra Rivera who wound up spending a month in jail, that’s a month’s loss of salary, probably lost his job, and all that he gets from Superior Court Judge Kathryn Solórzano is an apology.  Pardon me for thinking that as being a lot short of the mark. He is owed at the least, lost wages and a free ride back home.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

An article on the LA Times brings up the case of a man wrongfully convicted of murdering his wife. The comments are here. This is a case, one among very many, that argues against the Death Penalty.

In short, this is the case of a prosecutor so eager to crank up his ‘win’ record that he sent the wrong man to prison, fully knowing that he was the wrong man! He then tried to destroy evidence that he did so.

In detail the prosecutor’s office, withheld exculpatory evidence and when ordered to save and seal the evidence. When the envelop supposedly containing was opened, the evidence, contrary to court orders, was not there.

Mike Davis, the former assistant district attorney, was also compelled to testify.
According to a transcript, Davis blamed lead prosecutor Anderson for withholding evidence.

Of course, Anderson claimed innocence. In the meanwhile, the actual perpetrator lived free. Is Michael Morton going to be compensated for the 25 years of his lost freedom? What about his future? He is unemployable now, he has no pension, no social security, and is now too old to recover from this life-injury. The reality is that his life was stolen from him and ruined for the sake of a lawyer’s ambition. Someone owes this man large!

Rant

While this is an egregious case, it is only one among a large and dark cloud of such cases hanging over the American legal system. Prosecutors are allowed to attack anyone with complete impunity and they are rewarded for their zealousness by promotions (Anderson is now a judge) and political perks and powers while enjoying complete immunity for their actions. The system is corrupt!

I once believed in the Death Penalty but that is when I still believed that the legal system was infallible. How many of the many in Texas that were executed when they were actually innocent? It is unfortunate that we cannot un-execute a person. It is better to imprison them for life.

Prosecutors need to be made liable for their zealousness as well. Misconduct needs to be be met with mandatory prison time, in the General Prison Population! When they lose, they should lose their jobs as well.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

This video got my attention

About the Republic of the USA

It is also extremely worrisome. In the various forums, it is amazing how many people do not know that the US is a Republic and guaranteed to remain so by the US Constitution. The majority of them are Democrats.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

Yet another LA Times article, this one is about Prop 8.  The discussions are here.

It looks like it isn’t over yet. But the court is correct, it is about the initiative process and Prop 8 is a California Constitutional Amendment. This is serious stuff! However, I am confident that it will be overturned on US First Amendment grounds.

  1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Since the arguments for Prop 8 are solely religious in origin, prop 8 is clearly "respecting an establishment of religion" and prohibits "the free exercise thereof".


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

I commented on yet another LA Times article today. The main article is here.

"These kids got it," he said. "They understood the framework that was being laid out — that Hispanics are the oppressed and Caucasians are the oppressors. That’s very troubling." — Supt. John Huppenthal, Tucson Unified School District

The thing is that, this is nothing less than the truth. The entire Southwest was conquered by the US in the late 1800’s as a part of the Monroe Doctrine. Before then it was a part, a very valuable part, of Mexico. It was conquered through mass illegal immigration by US settlers, which gave the pretext for the Cavalry to invade in order to ‘protect’ those illegal settlers. It was exactly the same strategy used to conquer Texas and later on, Hawaii. After the conquest, the US engaged in systematic denigration and suppression of the native population that carries on to the present day, as evidenced by the Tucson law. A very large part of that was the systematic genocide of native Americans, the American Indian (Indians), by the US Cavalry. Former Mexican Nationals were not treated much better as they were largely of mixed Spanish and Indian blood.

This summer, Huppenthal drew fire after suggesting similarities between the program and the Hitler Youth. Huppenthal said the remarks were made on "an academic basis" and misunderstood.

He no longer draws the comparison, he said, because it is too inflammatory. But in an interview, he said, "The thing that Hitler did was he used perceptions of historical injustice, he cast them in racial terms, and then he also referred to the Sudetenland as a stolen land — that’s the parallel."

The Tucson Unified School District’s Mexican American studies program does nothing other than to teach the truth. To outlaw the truth is yet another case of repression and since they are now fourth and fifth generation Americans, they are also US citizens. Must they be continuously conquered?

Huppenthal replied that curriculum must reach a standard that all Arizonans can be proud of. "I’d ask those people who have challenged me, have they really met that standard over the last couple years?"

The thing is that there are things in US history that no American should be proud of and remembering those things might prevent their re-occurrence. The US has done many shameful things and a part of the healing is to admit to doing them and at least to try and make some reparation. Teaching the true history is one of them.

Land of the free and the home of the brave? This really makes me, and everyone else wonder. I am not that proud of being an American with this crap going on.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

Actually, there is law prohibiting smoking in a car with children. Read it for yourself.

I commented heavily.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

This is just a marker for a future article. I haven’t finished my latest book yet, why no one has seen of heard much from me.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

A family of seven, who remain unnamed, are about to lose four of their children for no other reason than that they are too fat.

The couple have not committed any crime and are not accused of deliberate cruelty or abuse. Their solicitor, Joe Myles, said there was ‘nothing sinister lurking in the background’ and accused social workers of failing to act in the family’s best interests.

Actually, nowhere in the article or subsequent research can I find any hint that these people have been convicted of any crime at all. The children are being taken strictly on Council Authority and without any detectable Due Process at all.

The couple and their children also had to adhere to a strict 11pm curfew. This involved ‘clocking’ in and out by filling in a sheet held by an employee who lived on site.

Basically, the family was placed into custody in a Council home. The only thing missing was the barbed wire but it is still a prison with live-in guards. They have still not been charged with any crime.

Her solicitor said he planned to use independent experts to prove that the children want to live with their parents and have been damaged by the social workers’ intervention. He added: ‘We may ultimately look towards human rights laws.’

No shit! Human rights my ass, this is a civil rights issue here! However, they obviously have no civil rights in the UK. The UK is not a free country. Those of you anglophiles who think that the UK does things right, take heed. No country that behaves like this can call themselves free.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

I am posting to the thread on the recent DEA statement on marijuana not having an acceptable medical use. It quickly morphed into a drug legalization debate. The entry I like best is

Slamlander at 05:58 AM July 12, 2011

Dihydrogen Monoxide has no acceptable medical use either and it is not on any drug schedule. It is highly addictive and has withdrawal symptoms that always result in death. Taken in excess, it can also result in death, more certain than marijuana. In fact, iut is 1000 times deadlier than heroine. Its potential for abuse is enormous.

Dihydrogen Monoxide is also known as a Universal Solvent and can dilute and carry in solution almost any other substance, both organic an inorganic. An overdose of Dihydrogen Monoxide kills by dissolving and leeching out the minerals in the body. The sufferer enters a coma and dies. there is no known treatment for  massive Dihydrogen Monoxide overdose.

Why isn’t it on the DEA’s Schedule I?

By comparison Marijuana is relatively benign.

I wonder if any of them will catch it Winking smile


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

I’ve been on the discussion board of the LA Times.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

New York Legislature passes gay marriage bill

This is actually a major defeat for the Religious Right. Winking smile

This is also a major victory for Constitutional Conservatives Smile

During the debates on the LA Times forum one commenter mentioned how the US was, as a nation, turning away from God. I have news for them and every other religious nutjob out there; The US turned away from God, as a Nation, the moment that the First Amendment was ratified. The US is a Secular Nation, by law and NOT by God!


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

In the US there is no true difference between a Conservative and a Liberal. In the US, a la Webster’s, a conservative is simply one who resists change. Do NOT apply this equally to political and moral conservatism. The are NOT the same, however much the Religious Right likes to conflate the two.

A political conservative is someone, like myself, that seeks to resist changes to the US Constitution, which is still the single most liberal political document ever written and enacted.

The Religious Right seeks to change the US Constitution, or it’s interpretation, to suit Puritan moral values. That makes them radicals, by definition. Radical is not Conservatism. To a true Constitutional Conservative, the Radical Social-Religious Right is anti-Liberty and therefore anathema. We must defend our holy document from such heresy as DOMA and Prohibition1 . The War on Drugs is a tool of the Puritanical Religious Right.

I am Constitutionally an extreme conservative but socially, I am also a bit of a Liberal because the US Constitution is. Puritan moral values and social mores are incompatible with the US Constitution. In short, you cannot be both an American and a religious moralist.

Too many call themselves conservative when they are actually religious moralists. We cannot fight the enemy as long as our terms are confused. Allowing the Religious Right to also call themselves the Political Right is conceding the war to the enemy, let alone the battle. It’s allowing wolves to call themselves sheep dogs. This is what has been happening to the GOP for years now. Palin and the Tea Party would like nothing more than to shred a document that they do not understand and do not even want to read, the US Constitution.

Remember during this election that the Political Right is NOT the same as the Moral or Religious Right and they will be trying to confuse us all by conflating the two.



  1. Note precisely that, there is no mention of banning substances or even controlling them in the US Constitution and before the amendments on alcohol, such were even considered unconstitutional. Most US Founding Fathers would today be in jail as drug users and abusers. []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

On the LA Times re: Gay judge wasn’t required to remove himself from same-sex marriage case, U.S. judge rules

A commenter named Ann Common said: “What we hate is sexual perversion.”

This is my response:

And now the truth is revealed! You are a hater. It may interest you to know that Victorian modes and culture [should have] died with Queen Victoria, the Hannover Queen. Wrapping yourself in a time-bubble will not change that.

I am not gay but I am a product of the 60′s, when my generation rejected puritan rules and the senseless taboos of the prohibitionistas who were in power at that time. Remember the California Communes?

"Signs, signs, everywhere there’re signs. blocking up the scenery, blowing my mind. Don’t do this or that, can’t you read the signs?"

Perversion is in the eye of the beholder, or not, as the case may be. Some think that a woman simply showing her face in public is a perversion. They even think that it causes earthquakes.

I am perfectly willing to let you believe in whatever you want but it is un-American to let you impose those beliefs on everyone else. We are NOT a Christian country, we are a Secular one, as evidenced by the First Amendment to the Constitution, and I reject the Religious Right, with fervor!

I relegate your Christian God to the same dark pit with the Muslim Allah; may they fondle each other forever, while humans get on with the business of humans, without their interference. I reject your rules that judge what is perversion and I reject your values as being un-American!

Families are supposed to love and support each other. Rejecting and oppressing such families simply because of your warped sense of perversion is the hallmark of a religiously repressive regime and not that of a free country. The only thing that we should be intolerant of is intolerance.

BTW, I have probably been a Republican longer than you’ve been alive and I reject the Religious Right/Moral Majority of Buchannan, Ford, and Quayle.


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

I could have sworn that I had already commented on this but it appears that I haven’t.

First, the California Proposition that tried to ban gay marriages (the infamous Proposition 8)  has been found unconstitutional.1

Then the Pro8 folks tried to overturn that ruling based on the fact that the Judge was openly gay.

Finally, the US District Court refuses to overturn that ruling.

In other news, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is declared unconstitutional in Federal Court.

The ruling Monday was also signed by 19 other judges on the 24-member court in an unusually emphatic display of consensus, he said.

That is an outstanding show of support for a judicial ruling.

In all of this I still haven’t gotten a clear answer. The key argument for Prop 8 is that it directly damages the bonds of heterosexual marriage. My question is: How does homosexual or any other form of consensual marriage damage heterosexual marriage?

Please, answer exactly and in simple secular terms, leaving your mythical gods at the door. It is a very simple question and I have yet to get even a complex answer. It is a question that the antagonists should have raised during the votation but the bible-thumpers shouted them down (how is that free speech, BTW).

As for the rest: Keep your gods out of my politics!



  1. I apologize for not having saved the actual link for this one []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

Does your laptop have rights?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. — Amendment four of the US Constitution

Note carefully that the only clause is one that includes probable cause and due process. This is followed closely by the fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. – Amendment five of the US Constitution.

There is no need to pass new legislation to enable these rights. They are already the supreme law of the land.

Present law permits border and customs agents to conduct electronic fishing expeditions. – referenced LA Times article

Actually, it does not.

The reason airport searches are exempt from the 4th Amendment’s protection against illegal searches is that baggage might conceal contraband or dangerous materials. – referenced LA Times article

That is actually a very weak argument but one that both the DEA and TSA use extensively. That it is used and often upheld does not make it correct.

Extending that exception to allow federal agents to rifle through the content of electronic devices is unjustifiable. Unfortunately, two federal appeals courts, in cases involving child pornography, have upheld the Department of Homeland Security’s policy of allowing searches of electronic devices at the border.   – referenced LA Times article

This is where I can agree but it needs no special legislation as it is already specifically written into the US Constitution, a Constitution that all Federal Employees are sworn to uphold and defend. What it needs is action by the ACLU or voting citizens to tell the government to stop violating our rights. What it really needs is the DHS to and particularly the TSA to be disbanded as rogue agencies of a rogue government.

How many of those confiscated laptops resulted in fair compensation to their owners as required under the fifth Amendment?

All it would take is for one (1) Congress-Critter to bring suit with the Supreme Court. It is certain that at $25M plus, a regular citizen can’t do it anymore, which is itself in violation of the principals behind the US Constitution.

Amerika, the fearful. Home of cowards and the land of the slaves.

(I am tempted to tell you that you deserve what you have but my daughter still lives there.)


Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

One of the biggest mass violations of the US Constitution is not being set right  but it is moving in that direction.

Charles Fahy, an appointee of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, deliberately hid from the court a report from the Office of Naval Intelligence that concluded the Japanese Americans on the West Coast did not pose a military threat.

US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Executive Order 9066, which authorized forced removal of Japanese Americans from "military areas" in 1942. The government and the military agreed the roundup of Japanese Americans was required as a matter of "military necessity." Roosevelt issued the order on Feb. 19, 1942, about two months after Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor, which plunged the U.S. into World War II.

Katyal said he decided it was important to publicly acknowledge the mistakes made in the solicitor general’s office. Hiding the truth from the justices, he said, "harmed the court, and it harmed 120,000 Japanese Americans. It harmed our reputation as lawyers and as human beings, and it harmed our commitment to those words on the court’s building: Equal Justice Under Law."

Over 120,000 Americans1  of Japanese decent were incarcerated in one of 10 prison camps in the country. California had two, Tule Lake and Manzanar. This was via Executive Order. There was no due process and most of those people lost everything they had when they were wrongfully incarcerated. Most of them were barely allowed the clothes on their backs and all of them lost whatever land that they owned with no remuneration or any sort of fair compensation.

Scholars and judges have denounced the World War II rulings as among the worst in the court’s history, but neither the high court nor the Justice Department had formally admitted they were mistaken — until now.

It is now 69 years down the timeline and only now is this crap coming to light.

He then looked into the history of the World War II internment cases, including documents revealed in the 1980s. Peter Irons, a professor at UC San Diego, had found reports in old government files that showed the U.S. military did not see Japanese Americans as a threat in 1942. His research led to federal court hearings that set aside the convictions of Korematsu and Hirabayashi. Congress later voted to have the nation apologize and pay reparations to those who were wrongly held.

The reparations were still not just or fair for what is, in essence, wrongful imprisonment and unlawful incarceration. compared to current practice for those crimes, the Congressional Reparations were a pittance, verging on an insult. It mainly rubbed salt in the wounds that the US Feral government had already flayed open.

Are you still proud to be an American? The US needs to stop doing wrongs! Those Guantanamo prisoners need to be tried in civil courts or released immediately. If there is no evidence then they should never have been incarcerated. The Illegal search and seizure practiced by the TSA on every airline flight needs to be stopped immediately. The US Feral Government needs to start living by its own Supreme Law of the Land, the US Constitution! If it does not then it should be dissolved!



  1. These were US citizens, natural-born, and some were even third generation Americans. []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

The unlawful detainment of known and obvious innocents is one of the first major proofs of a tyranny and the US is guilty as charged, again, and again! Amerika is NOT the land of the free! freedom at the convenience of the government is NOT freedom. It is not just the fact that Guantanamo exists, it is the fact that it can exist without major protest by the American sheeple. Amerika has forgotten the base meaning of freedom!

Again and again I point out that the Federal Government of the United States of America is a Rogue Government1 .

Since that scumbag (Abraham Lincoln) was handed War Powers during the US Civil War, no POTUS2 has ever relinquished a War Power willingly. Indeed, I suspect that to be the fundamental reason that Lincoln was assassinated. He was about to relinquish the tyrannical powers granted him for the Civil War. In truth, he should never have  had them! Note that the United States has been under continuous War Emergency since the US Civil War.

This parallels the sad history of the Romans, who started as a Republic run by a Triumvirate. They had an exemption for what they called a Tyrant3  .  I make careful and obvious note that the US Constitution has no provision for a tyrant. This is by careful design and is not an oversight. However, this and other non-trivial matters4 are simply ignored by the current US Federal Government. The US federal Government has long ago stopped being a government of the people and is now a tyranny of the Demo-Republican parties, The Tyrannical Republic of Amerika which is no better than The People’s Republic of North Korea. Both are fascist tyrannies, as was the old Roman Empire.

George Walker Bush (Junior Bush) is and was the most disgusting and evil President in US history5 . He has done more than anyone to undermine American freedoms and the US Constitution. Now, three years after we elected Obama, Barack Obama has proven that he is not one bit better than the Evil Bush. Obama has unilaterally extended the the Patriot Acts to long after the US Congress rescinded them. This is simply because he does not want to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security, the single largest Police State tool that has ever existed. The fact that he does not want to dismantle it makes him no better than the Evil Bush that built it in the first place.

 

Update: Ignoring the US Constitution.



  1. A rogue government is a government that does not follow its own rules. For the US, those rules are enshrined in the US Constitution. []
  2. President of the United States []
  3. This is where the word originally came from and simply means Supreme Commander, during times of war. Unfortunately, as Rome grew, they were always at war and their tyrants found it increasingly easier to decline to relinquish their tyranny until one finally declared himself Emperor. The parallel to the US Federal government is obvious. []
  4. Like the protections of the writ of habeas corpus and the protections against improper and unlawful search and seizure []
  5. I’m a Republican and I still hate him! []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

The unlawful detainment of known and obvious innocents is one of the first major proofs of a tyranny and the US is guilty as charged, again, and again! Amerika is NOT the land of the free! freedom at the convenience of the government is NOT freedom. It is not just the fact that Guantanamo exists, it is the fact that it can exist without major protest by the American sheeple. Amerika has forgotten the base meaning of freedom!

Again and again I point out that the Federal Government of the United States of America is a Rogue Government1 .

Since that scumbag (Abraham Lincoln) was handed War Powers during the US Civil War, no POTUS2 has ever relinquished a War Power willingly. Indeed, I suspect that to be the fundamental reason that Lincoln was assassinated. He was about to relinquish the tyrannical powers granted him for the Civil War. In truth, he should never have  had them! Note that the United States has been under continuous War Emergency since the US Civil War.

This parallels the sad history of the Romans, who started as a Republic run by a Triumvirate. They had an exemption for what they called a Tyrant3  .  I make careful and obvious note that the US Constitution has no provision for a tyrant. This is by careful design and is not an oversight. However, this and other non-trivial matters4 are simply ignored by the current US Federal Government. The US federal Government has long ago stopped being a government of the people and is now a tyranny of the Demo-Republican parties, The Tyrannical Republic of Amerika which is no better than The People’s Republic of North Korea. Both are fascist tyrannies, as was the old Roman Empire.

George Walker Bush (Junior Bush) is and was the most disgusting and evil President in US history5 . He has done more than anyone to undermine American freedoms and the US Constitution. Now, three years after we elected Obama, Barack Obama has proven that he is not one bit better than the Evil Bush. Obama has unilaterally extended the the Patriot Acts to long after the US Congress rescinded them. This is simply because he does not want to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security, the single largest Police State tool that has ever existed. The fact that he does not want to dismantle it makes him no better than the Evil Bush that built it in the first place.



  1. A rogue government is a government that does not follow its own rules. For the US, those rules are enshrined in the US Constitution. []
  2. President of the United States []
  3. This is where the word originally came from and simply means Supreme Commander, during times of war. Unfortunately, as Rome grew, they were always at war and their tyrants found it increasingly easier to decline to relinquish their tyranny until one finally declared himself Emperor. The parallel to the US Federal government is obvious. []
  4. Like the protections of the writ of habeas corpus and the protections against improper and unlawful search and seizure []
  5. I’m a Republican and I still hate him! []

Mirrored from The Slamlander.

You can comment here or there. This is also mirrored on Dreamwidth and Facebook.
All rights are reserved under US copyright law. More detail may be found on my Disclaimers and Rights page.

Profile

slamlander

June 2012

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 10:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios